Bellicose Bumpkin

Casino spurs more apartments
So I was on the edge of my seat last night, watching every thrilling twist and turn of the 1/23/2008 Middleboro Board Of Selectman meeting, when something interesting actually happened. The BOS were going through the yearly budgets with each department head. Generally the department head would give an overview after which the BOS would question specific line items to better understand the request budget.

Anyway, the head of the Building Dept. made his presentation, listed the pending residential developments in town(there were some 200 or so), and outlined the challenges he faces with the current staffing levels. As an aside, he mentioned that there was a 30-something acre property behind Adam’s Circle off of Anderson Ave. There are currently 28 apartment units there, and the owner recently told him that he wanted to build 80 more out back due to the resort casino. There is a video of this at the end of the post – the reward for slogging through my bloviations.

Everything is coming up roses
I know that when you put on pro-casino rose-colored glasses, all the low wage workers magically reside in Taunton or Brockton due to the lack of affordable housing in Middleboro. Well guess what folks: Middleboro has a lot of land – that’s why the casino came. What makes you all think that those 10,000+ jobs will not spur residential growth? It’s supply and demand. Our current stock of residential/rental property represents the current demand. When there are 10,000 workers off of Precinct Street, the demand will increase and by necessity so will the supply.

I hate to say “I told you so” … well not really
This is one of those costs that CasinoFacts.org has been talking about all this time. More residents means more kids in the school system, more roads to maintain, more sewer/water to take care of, more demand for police/fire/ems, and more work for each and every department in town. This leads to more town employees and yet more cost. In the case of this one group of apartments, I’m going to guestimate that this will lead to about 34 extra children in the school system. I get this number with this math: Approximately 24% of Massachusetts residents are children. Let’s say these 80 apartments will contain 160 people. If the average holds, 34 of these 160 people will be children under the age of 18. At $9,938 per student, that’s $337,000 in education costs alone. This is just one small development on one small piece of land introducing more cost.

How much more cost? I don’t know for sure. And neither do the people that sent us down this road without sufficient public input. This highlights why our deal is so poor. We are being paid an essentially fixed amount of money when we have no idea what our costs will be or how much those costs will increase in the future.

Or as Representative Tom Calter described the deal: “A fixed revenue stream and variable costs”. Translation: We got taken. Lacking any decent numbers, let’s assume our cost will be something similar to what a commercial facility would pay us. And that’s twice as much as we’re getting. Oh happy day.

Make sure you notice the “Oh crap” moment of silence by the BOS after learning about the 80 new apartments.

   Send article as PDF to