Your Ad Here
Home > Clyde Barrow, casino > Clyde ticks me off sometimes

Clyde ticks me off sometimes

Ever since the news that the Middleboro casino investors had stopped payments to the tribe, there have been a number of articles and blogs dissecting the information.

It’s funny how people read a news article and are affected in different ways. Whenever I see a news report that describes the agreement as being worth $11M, I go apoplectic. I took note while reading an Alice Elwell article that described Wayne Perkins as “a chief negotiator”. I wondered what Adam Bond would think of that. Apparently not much since he wrote a blog post that lambasted Wayne Perkins for his position that return of pre-payment monies is covered in the IGA(it’s not).

Personally I don’t think the tribe would come after the money, but I fully support the notion of getting it in writing. Why wouldn’t we?

Clyde … WTF!?
So clearly that “chief negotiator” thing got Adam’s panties in a twist and here’s something from a recent news article that bunched up my knickers:


Casino gaming specialist Clyde Barrow, a professor at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth’s Center for Policy Analysis, still believes the deal the town cut for the casino is a good one.

In June 2007, he described the first agreement this way:


“It’s a bad deal for Middleboro, its residents and the town’s future tax base,”

My recommendation is that they go back to the drawing board,” he said. “Let the study committee do its work.”

If it does, he said, Middleboro might get a deal more like that negotiated in 2006 between the Narragansett Tribe and the Rhode Island town of West Warwick. That agreement would pay the town $14 million the first year, up to $21 million in the 10th year — all based on the tribe paying 2 percent of its gross revenue along with local property taxes and other local fees.

Middleboro’s deal, said Dr. Barrow, agrees that the tribe will put the casino land into trust, cutting the town (and state) off from regulating and taxing any of it.

“The land-in-trust issue has not been adequately explored other than through the spin coming from (tribe spokesman) Scott Ferson and (tribal chairman) Glenn Marshall,” said Dr. Barrow.

The state, he ventured, is leaning away from tribal land in trust and toward commercial casino ventures with Indian themes and ownership. So is the federal government, he added, because a proliferation of land-in-trust deals leaves casinos springing up anywhere.

He added that the federal approval of such an arrangement is unlikely; it has been granted in only three instances.


So when did a “bad deal” become a “good one”. Granted that Barrows was talking about the first agreement, but the financials of the second one are very similar.

It just goes to show that you never know what will piss somebody off.

PDF    Send article as PDF to
Categories: Clyde Barrow, casino Tags:
  1. Anonymous
    June 26th, 2009 at 10:11 | #1

    BB,

    How dare you point out that Clyde thought the deal was a bad one and now thinks it is a good one! The reason is simply, Clyde forgot he needs to shill for EVERY casino deal that comes into New England.

    Clyde is back on track(get it track) and willing to gladly take whatever money the town/tribe or new/old investors would like to give him to fund a (hee hee) STUDY.

  2. Anonymous
    June 26th, 2009 at 10:25 | #2

    Bumpkin,

    I am sorry to challenge you, having just been called a Commie Pinko but can you explain your title? Clyde pisses me off all the time!

  3. Anonymous
    June 26th, 2009 at 10:55 | #3

    Who cares what Clyde "Opinion-for-Hire" Barrows says?

    Now that Sol Kerzner is no longer backing the Middleboro mega-bingo hall, maybe we can get him to pay Clyde to say that casinos are a bad idea in MA?

  4. Anonymous
    June 26th, 2009 at 11:29 | #4

    Is Wayne Perkins the self-described 'chief negotiator' because he was involved in back room, behind the scene deals before anyone caught on?

    Assuming he was 'chief negotiator,' he said towns in CT with casinos don't pay taxes.

    The town's budget was about $70 million this year.

    Wayne, why didn't you begin negotiations at $70 million with an escalation clause instead of hotel rooms that will be comped for a hotel that won't be built and won't deliver what was promised?

  5. Bellicose Bumpkin
    June 26th, 2009 at 11:32 | #5

    I've heard that "he said towns in CT with casinos don't pay taxes." thing a number of times.

    I've always assumed he misspoke and meant that the casinos in CT don't pay taxes to the towns.

    But what do I know? I don't recall where the original quote come from.

  1. February 6th, 2010 at 08:05 | #1

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free