DeLeo, slots, and Middleboro
Refusing to do an honest cost/benefit analysis of expanded gambling, House Speaker Robert DeLeo has unveiled his plan to file legislation that would bring slots to the racetracks and resort casinos. He also felt compelled to dazzle us with the depth of his character by announcing that “I’ve always been a slots person”. Personally I’ve always been a “let’s see if this makes sense” person. Refusal to do an honest accounting of the costs of expanded gambling – particularly slots – is just plain wrong.
.
Clyde Barrows, who annoys me more every day, was quoted in the article – but of course what article on Massachusetts casinos would be complete without Barrows’ inciteful analysis? What cracks me up is that Barrows was the author of a study that called for just three resort casinos as the best way to “maximize the economic impacts of expanded gambling in Massachusetts, while minimizing or mitigating its social impacts”. Now he’s on board with the slots-4-all bill being proposed by SlotMan DeLeo and Not-In-My-Town Therese Murray:Good ‘ol flip-flop Barrow called the Middleboro casino agreement a “bad deal for Middleboro” in 2007 now softens that analysis by calling it “the most lucrative local host deal ever executed in the United States”. Get off the fence dude and make up your mind.
.
As far as how this will affect Middleboro and the area:Clearly something is afoot. As things stand, the Middleboro casino is not feasible due to the massive infrastructure required in the IGA. The tribe has been nosing around in the Fall River area and the Commission on Indian affairs is talking about taking the Wampsutta Reservation into trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag, even though it seems to be Pocasset tribal land. As I’ve said before, it blows my mind that anyone would consider giving the Mashpee Wampanaog a casino at this time given the problems they’ve had managing themselves and their lack of experience in casino management. Meanwhile, the Middleboro BOS remain blissfully unaware of the goings on and the Middleboro Albatross Casino continues to stunt local development by keeping us all in a state of perpetual limbo.
.
Clyde Barrows, who annoys me more every day, was quoted in the article – but of course what article on Massachusetts casinos would be complete without Barrows’ inciteful analysis? What cracks me up is that Barrows was the author of a study that called for just three resort casinos as the best way to “maximize the economic impacts of expanded gambling in Massachusetts, while minimizing or mitigating its social impacts”. Now he’s on board with the slots-4-all bill being proposed by SlotMan DeLeo and Not-In-My-Town Therese Murray:Good ‘ol flip-flop Barrow called the Middleboro casino agreement a “bad deal for Middleboro” in 2007 now softens that analysis by calling it “the most lucrative local host deal ever executed in the United States”. Get off the fence dude and make up your mind.
.
As far as how this will affect Middleboro and the area:Clearly something is afoot. As things stand, the Middleboro casino is not feasible due to the massive infrastructure required in the IGA. The tribe has been nosing around in the Fall River area and the Commission on Indian affairs is talking about taking the Wampsutta Reservation into trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag, even though it seems to be Pocasset tribal land. As I’ve said before, it blows my mind that anyone would consider giving the Mashpee Wampanaog a casino at this time given the problems they’ve had managing themselves and their lack of experience in casino management. Meanwhile, the Middleboro BOS remain blissfully unaware of the goings on and the Middleboro Albatross Casino continues to stunt local development by keeping us all in a state of perpetual limbo.
Categories: Mashpee Wampanoag, Middleboro, Middleboro casino, casino

Recent Comments